City chic Books in Order

FictionHumor & SatireRomance

Rate this series:

The City Chic series follows urban professionals navigating personal and professional challenges in metropolitan settings. It explores themes of identity, relationships, and self-discovery through characters dealing with pasts and present dilemmas. The stories often focus on the tension between ambition and personal fulfillment in city life.

Publication order

In the order the books were originally released.

  1. Cover of Thirtynothing

    Thirtynothing

    2000 · Lisa Jewell

    Dig Ryan runs into his first love, Delilah, twelve years later and realizes he still fancies her. His best friend of fifteen years, Nadine, who has…

    Read more →
    Buy on Amazon
  2. Cover of Confessions of a Shopaholic, Shopaholic Takes Manhattan, and Shopaholic Ties the Knot (Shopaholic Series, Books 1, 2, & 3)

    Confessions of a Shopaholic, Shopaholic Takes Manhattan, and Shopaholic Ties the Knot (Shopaholic Series, Books 1, 2, & 3)

    2001 · Sophie Kinsella

    This omnibus collects three novels about Becky Bloomwood, a young woman with a big heart and a shopping addiction who cannot afford her lifestyle of…

    Read more →
    Buy on Amazon
  3. Cover of The Undomestic Goddess

    The Undomestic Goddess

    2005 · Sophie Kinsella

    Workaholic London attorney Samantha Sweeting makes a huge mistake that threatens her partnership, walks out of her office, and ends up mistaken for a…

    Read more →
    Buy on Amazon

Frequently asked questions

What order should I read the City chic books in?

Read them in publication order, starting with “Thirtynothing”. Start with “Thirtynothing.”

How many books are in the City chic series?

We list 3 books by Sophie Kinsella , published between 2000–2005.

Where can I buy the City chic books?

Each title above links to Amazon. See our affiliate disclosure.

Reading order compiled from author/publisher guidance and verified bibliographic data. Spotted a wrong order, a missing book, or any other mistake? and we'll correct it.